From,
Hyderabad,
Sri A.V. Subba Reddy M.Sc (Ag)
12-12- 2015.
Asst. Director of Agriculture (Retired)
6-3- 596/95/A; Naveen Nagar, Khairatabad,
Hyderabad
500 004
To
The reader,
Citizen of India
Sir,
Please find here in the enclosed
article on “Interlinking the Rivers of India through Trench- Cum- Contour
channels to bring about sustainability in Agriculture”. I request you to go
through the article and comment upon this for implementation in order to bring
about sustainability in Agriculture in India.
Further I invite your valuable suggestions for
the ‘Hell to Heaven development of India with this concept’ duly pointing the
objections on this article.
Thanking you,
sir.
Yours sincerely,
A.V. Subba Reddy
How to
bring about the sustainability in agriculture in India by mitigating the ill
effects of natural calamities like drought, floods and cyclones etc.
Why the farmer is going to borrow
money for his crop inputs? Why does he suicide? Is he solely responsible for
his suicide? Or else. Whether his production is lesser than his investments? Is
the loss is at production level or marketing level? Who is responsible? Is the
farmer himself or the middle man or Government officials or the politicians or
the people in the society as a whole?
India has 165 M. ha of cultivated
land. Out of which 108 M. ha of land is under drought prone area belongs to 99
districts in 13 states, which is nearly 70% of the cultivated area that is
being subjected to vagaries of monsoon. It is experienced that out of 4
years, once in 3 years there is complete failure of crops, once in 4 years
there is a good crop and in the remaining 2 years average yields can be
expected. It means that the dry land farmer never come out of his debts.
What is necessary for the crops to
grow? Water? Yes, water. Water is the
vital resource for all living things. So also for the plants. No living thing
exists without water. It is the prime requirement after the air.
In drought prone areas water is deficit.
Is India a water deficit country? No. Not at all. The average rainfall of India
is 1200mm and it is more than the world average rainfall of 990mm.The total
amount of rainfall received in India is about 400 M. ham i.e. 4000 billion cum.
Out of which, 165 M. ham of water is going waste and draining into the seas.
If this can be harnessed, It is sufficient to irrigate all the cultivable area
of 165 M. ha; If manned properly.
Can we solve the farmer’s suicide by scraping of his loan every time? Is
it guanine? Certainly it cannot solve the problem. Instead, by supplying water
to all the drought prone areas, the problem can be solved. Can‘t the famer get
profitable returns from his farm, if sufficient water is provided? Certainly,
he can. If, so where is the necessity for him to commit suicide?
Is the watershed programme yielding desirable results which are intended
to mitigate the drought situations? Is this programme able to mitigate the
drought situation? Is there any technicality in the present day of execution?
Are they being systematically executed? Can we differentiate a watershed area
and non-watershed area when we travel across? Is it not a wasteful expenditure?
Are the ‘in-pits’ being executed in the watershed programme are useful? How
useful the check dams, rock fill dams and soil conservation works are? Are
these activities mitigating drought conditions? Programs like Kanuga
plantation, Khus as a barrier, Indira Kranthi Pathakam, plantation programmes
etc. are yielding desired results?
For all these programmes water is the main input which is scarce in
drought prone areas. Without water no plant can survive. One must bear this in
mind before planning a programme. Without providing water, planting of trees/
growing of crops is a gamble in the monsoon. They cannot alleviate the drought
situation and stabilize the crop production. So, water need to be provided to
the drought prone areas to bring sustainability in crop production in these
areas.
How to provide water to these areas? By constructing the dams, check
dams, or by taking up of Soil conservation works or inter-linking of rivers?
Can they solve the problem? No. It is proved that they can’t solve. It is also
proved that the construction of huge dams across the rivers encountered many
problems and failed to solve the problems as desired.
Is the present day idea of interlinking of
rivers as envisaged in the proposed draft plan can address the problem
effectively?.
As seen from the perspective plan of the proposed Inter basin Water
Transfer links, It is evident that the most of the rivers are linked at lower
reaches leaving larger portions of drought prone areas on the upper reaches. It
appears that due attention has not been paid in addressing the problems of the
Drought Prone Areas; such as:
·
In supplying the irrigation water by
gravitational means to all the drought prone areas in order to stabilize the
agricultural production and also to boost up the crop production to meet the
future demands.
·
In providing water for drinking and other
purposes to the drought trodden areas.
·
In alleviating the havocs caused by the
Natural calamities like floods and cyclone, earthquakes etc.
·
In addressing the pollution control.
·
In eradicating the soil erosion.
More over the lifting of water
involves recurring finance. In view of the above, the plan needs to be
re-examined long with the plan of Captain Dastur’s proposal of garland canal.
Captain Dastur’s plan may be re-examined for consideration.
One ought to bear in mind that it is impossible to
stabilize agricultural production in India and to stop suicides of farmers
without supplying gravitational water to the drought prone areas, since 70% of
the cultivated area ( about 108m.ha against 165m.ha) is under drought prone
areas being subjected to vagaries of monsoon.
The only way to solve the problem is first
we have to nationalise the rivers of India. We have a network of road ways,
Railways which are nationalised. Why not river waters? The only way to solve
the problem is inter linking of all rivers of India through Trench cum contour
channels.
How many channels are needed? At what
contour levels/intervals? What is the width and depth of the channel? How they are useful? What are the advantages?
What are the limitations? All these need to be discussed with subject matter
specialists thoroughly before designing the trench cum contour channels.
Is it possible to execute trench
cum contour channels? What are the hurdles during execution? Can they be
resolved or cannot be? How to design them? Whether the present technology
available in India is sufficient for the execution? Can they arrest the natural calamities like
floods, drought? Can they mitigate the
high wind speed? Can they stop the
losses caused due to floods? Can they alleviate droughts? In order to achieve
them, how to design the trench-cum contour channels? By Inter-linking of rivers
with a trench cum contour channels, can they change the climate of the area
from monsoonal? Can they change and
improve the health of the soil? Can they reduce the hazards of air pollution
and water pollution and soil problems and get back the healthy environment? Yes,
we can solve.
Inter
linking of Rivers of India through Trench Cum Contour channels.
Present Scenario:
Resources:
1.
Air
2.
Water
3.
Land
4.
Human beings.
Air, water and land are the prime requirements for the
life to exist
1.
Air
Natural
Vegetation
– We require the Forest cover- 33
% (110M.ha). But the
forest cover is being depleted year by year as shown here under.
60 M. ha
– 1970
50 M. ha
– 1980
32 M. ha
– 1990 (10%)
Annual
depletion of land: Out of
2.5 M. ha land depletion, 1.5 M. ha from Forest lands only and this amount to
5% of the existing Forest covers.
Air
Pollution and raise in temperature: They can
be controlled by planting trees.
Pollution
from factories: Necessary
steps to be taken to reduce their ill effects.
2. Water
Water is the vital resource and it is
essential for the survival of life. Fresh water occurs from rivers (Perennial
rivers and ephemeral rivers), ponds etc. as surface waters and from wells, Bore
wells etc. as underground water. Sea water is the saltwater.
India’s
Water Budget- Present scenario.
Average annual rainfall of India: 1200mm or 400M.ham. (Slightly above the
global average rainfall of 990mm)
Distribution
of rainfall in India:
25% of the rainfall is unseasonal.
30% of the area receive < 750mm
40% of the area receive in between 750 –
1250mm
20% of the area receive 1250 -2000mm
10% of the area receive >2000 mm
|
|
Initial
rainfall distribution
|
Final
rainfall distribution
|
|
Soil Moisture
|
165M.ha.m (41.25%)
|
40M.ha.m (10%)
|
|
Deep percolation
|
50M.ha.m (12.50%)
|
36M.ha.m (9%)
|
|
Evaporation
|
70M.ha.m (17.50%)
|
164M.ha.m (41%)
|
|
Surface Run-off
|
115M.ha.m (28.75%)
|
160M.ha.m (40%)
|
|
Total
|
400M.ha.m
|
400h.m
|
Rivers carry 80% of the runoff during Monsoon
months.
Total rainfall: 4000 b. cum or 4 Trillion.
Cum
Utilizable runoff water: 1528b.cum = 53960
TMC or say 54,000 TMC.
Present Utilization of surface water: 176
billion. Cum
+ Subsurface (underground) water: 100
billion. Cum.
Scope for further utilization: 1250 billion.
Cum /4385 TMC
Present Planning
Major & medium Project: 58 M. ha
Minor Irrigation Projects: 15 M. ha
Subsurface
Irrigation (Underground): 40 M. ha
Total Planned area under Irrigation: 113 M .ha
35 M. ha can also be bringing under
Irrigation by high investments. It is proposed to bring an area of about 140 M.
ha of land under irrigation by 2050. 690 billion Cum can be utilized through
Dams beside 418 billion Cum of underground water can also be utilized.
Rainfall: 4000
B. cum
Trans-boundary flow: 300 B. cum
Returns: 259 B. Cum
Total: 4559 B. Cum
Evapotranspiration: 2347 B. cum
Withdrawals: 1180
B. Cum
Total: 3527 B. Cum
Remaining water = 4559 – 3527 = 1032 B. cum =
36,444 TMC and that can irrigate 146 m. ha of land.
1 TMC of water can irrigate 10,000 acres or
4000 ha of land; 54,000 TMC = 216 M. ha can be irrigated. So, it is possible to
irrigate the entire cultivable area of 165 M. ha of India with the available
water if planned properly.
3. Land
Total geographical area of India : 328 M. ha
176 M. ha Gross cropped area
140 M.ha Net cropped area.
35 M.ha degraded forest
40 M.ha Non-available for cultivation
16 M.ha Waste lands
25 M.ha under fallow
24 M.ha unaccounted area.
68% of cropped area is the dry land area,
contributing 44% of food grains and supporting 60% of livestock population.
Natural calamities: Floods,
Droughts, Hazards like cyclones, water and wind erosion
Erosion: Water and wind are
the twin evils of soil
Water erosion: Loss of Top soil:
12 billion tonnes /year or 36.5tonnes /ha whereas the tolerable limit is 4
tonnes/ha. The loss of soil from 80M.ha of cultivated lands is about 6000 M.
tonnes /year and the loss of nutrients is about 8.4 M. tons (2.5M.tons of N,
3.3 M .tons of P and 2.6M.tons of K). 178 M. ha of land is seriously affected
by soil erosion at present. The total loss of nutrients (NPK) is about 10-16 M.
tons/ year which is equivalent to the loss of 60-100M.tons of food production.
Siltation
hazard: It is 200 – 1500% higher than the estimated
amount.
4.
Sea, Sea coast & Sea Products:
5.
Coal, Iron & other Minerals:
6.
Population:
7.
Life style
The increase of human population is in
geometrical Progression whereas the food production is in arithmetical
progression. The present food production is about 200M.tonnes. By 2020
the requirement is about 300M.tonnes and the estimated population by 2050 is
about 1600 millions, require nearly 500 M. tonnes of food grains.
Hell to
heaven – Development
Hypothesis:-
Inter Linking of
rivers through Trench cum contour channels
All Indian Rivers need to be nationalised.
- Inter- state Trench-cum- contour channels: Choose the appropriate number of contour channels needed with their contour levels. Say: 50 – 100 m (80m); 200 – 350 m (300m); 400 – 600m (550m) or at 100m; 200 – 225m; 300 – 325m; 500 – 550m; that are more convenient and economical. The top most contour level be decided keeping in view the major portion of the cultivable area must fall below this contour level. The width of the channels may be I km or two adjoining channels with 500m each or even less. The depth of the channels may be 5 – 10m. The contour channels may be designed keeping the inflow and out flows.
2.
Intra-state contour channels: In
between the two Inter-state channels, State Contour Channels may be dug at 5 –
10 m vertical interval with a width of 50 – 100m and with a depth of 5 – 10m.
3.
Intra- Mandal contour: These may
be provided at 500m horizontal interval or 1 -2m vertical interval.
4.
From all the rivers or streams, channels may
be provided on either side from the FTL of the contour channel and join them to
the contour channel at ground level.
5.
Barrages may be provided across the
river/stream with shutters to regulate the water flow.



Barrage
Contour Channel
6.
Silt load from the mountains etc. can be
reduced by providing suitable silt traps before the water empties into the
contour channel.
7.
Pipelines may be laid to facilitate flood,
sprinkler or drip irrigation.

Connecting channel L
- All along the contour channel different types of trees may be planted on the upstream side to a width of 2 – 3 km depending upon the soil type and climatic conditions of the area so as to meet the timber, fruit, and medicinal requirements of the country /state/ the area in particular.
The
level of the contour channel can be deviated as per the existing
topographical conditions (situations) Viz. while crossing village sites,
already constructed project areas, valleys etc. It is also possible to
pass the contour channels across the ridges by tunnelling or deep cuts or
by connecting two ridged of the same level by providing pipelines with
concrete so as to facilitate to pass water from one ridge to the other (U-
tube concept) and vice versa depending upon the prevailing field conditions.
Hillock/ridge Pipe line (U-Tube) Hillock/ridge
Hillock/ridge
Tunnel
Channel
Hillock/ridge
10.
Drainage pipes may be provided to drain the
water collected against the upstream bund to avoid stagnation
Channel
Drainage pipe
11.
The
width of the channel can also be increased or decreased depending on the type
of soil. More width may be provided at withered zones to facilitate percolation
of water deep in to the soil in order to raise the underground water table
level and decreased while passing at rocky areas or hilly areas so as to reduce
the cost and also to raise the head of flow so as to increase the rate of flow
of water in the contour channel due to constriction of channel.
12.
The shape of the channel can also be changed
depending upon the type of soil and its angle of repose. Black soils 1:3 or
more; red soils 1: 1 ; Rocky soils 1:1; sandy soils – channels may
be constructed with cement concrete etc.
13.
It is also possible either to increase or
reduce the flow of water in the contour channel by decreasing or increasing the
width of the channel respectively. The rate of flow increased by constricting
/reducing the width and reducing the rate by increasing the width of the
channel.
Wide Constricted wide
14.
Necessary provision for the periodical
removal of silt in the contour channels and also to clean the channels may be
made.
15.
Rain gauges need to be established to measure
the rain water contribution from each state in order to facilitate water
allocation properly.
16.
Take 20% of the rain fall as runoff and allot
the same quantity of water from the contour channel to that area of the state
and measure the quantity of water flowing through that particular river at its
head in the particular state, divide this by the total catchment area of that particular
river and multiply the area of the catchment of the particular state under the
river. Allot this water in addition to the quantity of water received through
rainfall.
Let ‘x’
TMC of water is entering into a particular state, say ‘P’ state from its
upstream side.
The total
rainfall received in ‘p’ state be ‘y’ TMC
20% of the
water is the runoff from the state 0.2y TMC.
Provide
this water to the state ‘p’ at first from the flood water ‘x’.
The area
of ‘p’ state within the watershed area be ‘a’ ha
Total area
of the watershed on D/s of the ‘p’ state including the area of the ‘p’ state =
A ha
The total
quantity of water received by the state ‘p’
= 0.20Y +
(x – 0.20y)
TMC
17.
At National level, the services of the
engineering personnel may be best utilized keeping them all along the contour
channel to regulate the water flow without causing flooding and to allocate
water to each state as per the calculations enumerated supra.
18.
The services of Forestry, Horticultural,
agricultural may also be best utilized to maintain the trees planted on the
upstream side of the contour channel.
19.
At the state level also the services of the
Engineering staff may be utilized to allocate water to each Mandal and also to
fill all the existing water bodies such as dams, tanks, ponds etc.
20.
The services of Horticultural, Forestry and
Agricultural staff may best be utilized for planning and execution of crop
production programmes and for regulating the water and planning of trees and
crops depending upon the availability of water and type of soil and the
prevailing climatic conditions etc. so as to boost up the production.
21.
The sewage and industrial waste water should
not be let into these contour channels directly in order to avoid water
pollution. They should be purified and reutilized or necessary arrangements may
be made to percolate into the soil.
22.
Wild life sanctuaries, swimming pools, parks
and other tourism spots may be developed all along the contour channels.
23.
Road ways, Railway tracts and Navigation
facilities may be provided.
24.
Provision for diverting the water from one
contour channel to another adjoining channel may be provided so as to
facilitate for repairing or de-silting of the channels.
25.
Fly overs may be provided to facilitate for
easy movement of vehicles and human beings etc.
Note: To protect
and improve our natural resources a permanent system need to be established.
Top most priority has to be given to Agricultural sector and in stabilising
the agricultural production and main focus need to be given for establishing
Agriculture based industries rather than other industries.
Advantages
of contour channels:
1.
Since there is a dead storage in the contour
channels, the water table levels in the downstream side will be raised and
mitigate the drought situation.
2.
They convey water and facilitate to fill all
the water bodies like dams, tanks, ponds etc. with water.
3.
It is easy to convey water from upper channel
to lower channel.
4.
It is possible to irrigate all the area below
the level of the contour channel by gravity..
5.
Ground water can be utilised in conjunction
with surface water.
6.
As it is possible to regulate the flood flows
from the rivers, the damages caused by floods can be avoided.
7.
The ill effect of the fluoride in areas
having high fluoride contents can be solved by dissolving and removal of excess
fluoride content from that area as there is sufficient water available for
washing away the excess fluoride.
8.
As there are trees all along these contour
channels and also contour channels acts as drainage channels, salinization and
alkalisation can be avoided besides helps in reclaiming these problematic
soils.
9.
The water from existing springs and where the
water table is within 5/10 m from the ground level will contribute their water
in to the contour channels.
10.
The ill effects of cyclones, storms with high
winds speed on the crop losses will be reduced and save the agricultural as
well as horticultural crops etc. from these adverse effects as the trees act as
wind breaks and also shelter belts and thus save the huge investments on these.
11.
It is possible to bring about all the drought
prone area under irrigation.
12.
Soil erosion can be kept within the tolerable
limit and save the losses of nutrients as the channels are intercepting the
slope of the land.
13.
Navigation and tourism can be developed all
along these contour channels.
14.
The climate of the area (Monsoonal) may be
changed.
15.
The base flow of the rivers may be developed.
16.
Reduce the damages and havocs caused due to
earthquakes or breaking of dams etc.
17.
It is possible to bring about sustenance in
agricultural production and to achieve the production of 550 M. tonnes.
18.
It is possible to irrigate all the available
cultivable area of 165M ha
19.
It can solve the drinking water problem in
drought prone areas.
20.
Fish culture can also be taken up.
21.
The system can provide the fruit, timber and
medicinal requirements of the people of India.
Limitations: Acquiring the
land and Rehabilitation is the major task. This has to be over come
in view of numerous benefits enumerated supra and allocating the irrigable area
to owner whose land taken for this purpose.
Other
aspects:
1. Drainage lines/ waterways:
·
The drainage lines/ water ways can best be
utilized as Water bodies and for diversion of water.
·
Raise the banks of each river/rivulet/stream/streamlets
etc; so that no flood water enter into the adjoining fields on either side.
·
Construct check dams across the said water
ways to store water and to divert the water into other side channels/pipelines
·
Improve the drainage system of the village/town
and plant trees all along on either side of the road in order to bring them as
clean and green habitation.
2. Utilization of Solar / wind/ tidal Energy:
·
Establish research centres to take up
research on tapping solar energy etc. to produce current within affordable
cost.
·
Encourage the people for utilization of solar
energy by fixing solar appliances on each and every building. Thus utilizing
solar energy by every house holder in conjunction with the conversional current
(Hydro/thermal) in order to reduce the pressure on them.
·
Utilize solar energy, wind energy, tidal
energy, frictional energy, energy from waste materials etc.
·
Establish solar/wind /tidal etc. plants where
ever economical.
3. Education:
·
Abolish the unfruitful educational
institutions at once.
·
Establish residential schools, colleges and
educate the future citizens of India (All children without considering the
caste and creed etc.)
·
Appoint the most efficient, clever and well
qualified persons as teachers, lecturers.
·
The entire cost of the education must be
borne by the government.
·
The government should establish skill
oriented institutions based on the identified available resources in order to
utilize their services after completion of the training.
·
The amount paid on each of the candidate for
education /training etc. can be reimbursed from their salaries in order to
maintain the institutions further.
·
The duty of the Govt. is to identify the
available resources and utilize them properly along with human resources.
·
Strengthen the institutions by providing
latest equipment besides sending the master trainers to abroad for learning
latest technology and skills available in the world.
·
Human resources to be fully utilized in India
only. No scope is given to go abroad for want of job.
4. Utilization of manpower (Human resource):
·
Utilization of the services of the retired
personnel/Pensioners and old persons etc. :
The services of the senior citizens need to
be utilized properly.
Paying
pensioners without work is not genuine and it is nothing but the wasting of our
human power. Their physical and mental power or experience need to be utilized.
The services of Old people, disabled people can also be utilized by identifying
their skills.
If
the physic is not permit, join them in the old age homes and by providing
nurses
and doctors to attend them and to lead a happy
life without worries until they leave
this
world. So, the services of all the people need to be utilized properly without
wasting
the power of human resource.
·
Establish old age homes for old, disabled and
for patients by providing the require nurses and doctors to attend them
.
5. Abolish Unfruitful schemes:
·
Most of the Govt. schemes are being misused.
Reservations, free schemes etc. need to be abolished. The govt. need to provide
employment to all the people and utilize their man power.
6. Medical Facilities:
·
Establish natural cure centres, Unani,
Ayurveda, Homeopathy, Allopath centres and appoint doctors, nurses for each and
every village by utilizing their services as these are India’s rich and varied
heritage.
·
Update their skills by providing training.
·
At Mandal level establish hospitals for minor
operations and at district level Super speciality hospitals with latest
equipment and well trained and skilful doctors and nurses and other staff members.
At state level super speciality hospitals that are equivalent to hospitals at
abroad.
7. Agriculture:
·
Provide pipelines. Establish drip irrigation
system. Encourage organic farming/ permaculture. Reduce the usage of chemical
fertilizers, pesticides etc. Provide
good drainage to improve the physical condition of the soil. Maintain good soil
health. Discourage the constructions in the cultivable lands.
Use the land as per its capability
8. Vertical Housing system:
·
Encourage vertical housing in order to save
the land.
·
Utilize the land for establishing parks; play
grounds, Yoga centres etc.
- Utilization of scarce and exhaustible resources:
·
Need to be utilized
judiciously. Utilize them in inland by discouraging Exports.
Appendix
|
Estimates of water
resources of India
|
|
|
Agency
|
Estimate in BCM
|
|
1st
Irrigation Commission (1902-03)
|
1443
|
|
Dr. A.N. Khosla
(1949)
|
1673
|
|
Central water and
power commission (1954-66)
|
1881
|
|
National Commission
on Agriculture
|
1850
|
|
Central Water
Commission (1988)
|
1880
|
|
Central Water Commission
(1993)
|
1869
|
|
Water Resource
Potential of River Basins of India
|
||||
|
Sl.No
|
River Basin
|
Catchment
Area (Sq.km)
|
Average
water resources potential(BCM)
|
Utilisable
surface water resource
(BCM)
|
|
1
|
Indus
|
321,289
|
73.3
|
46
|
|
2
|
a).
Ganga
|
861,452
|
525
|
250
|
|
|
b).
Brahmaputra
|
194,413
|
41,723
|
537.2
|
|
|
c).
Barak and others
|
48,4
|
24
|
-
|
|
3
|
Godavari
|
312,812
|
110.5
|
76.3
|
|
4
|
Krishna
|
258,948
|
78.1
|
58
|
|
5
|
Cauvery
|
81,155
|
21.4
|
19
|
|
6
|
Subarnarekha
|
29,196
|
12.4
|
6.8
|
|
7
|
Brahmani
& Baitarni
|
51,822
|
28.5
|
18.3
|
|
8
|
Mahanadi
|
141,589
|
66.9
|
50
|
|
9
|
Pennar
|
55,213
|
6.3
|
6.9
|
|
10
|
Mahi
|
34,842
|
11
|
3.1
|
|
11
|
Sabarmati
|
21,674
|
3.8
|
1.9
|
|
12
|
Narmada
|
98,796
|
45.6
|
34.5
|
|
13
|
Tapi
|
65,145
|
14.9
|
14.5
|
|
14
|
West
flowing rivers from Tapi to Tadri
|
55,940
|
87.4
|
11.9
|
|
15
|
West
flowing rivers from Tadri to Kanyakumari
|
56,177
|
113.5
|
24.3
|
|
16
|
East
flowing rivers between Mahanadi and Pennar.
|
86,643
|
22.3
|
13.1
|
|
17
|
East
flowing rivers between Pennar and Kanyakumari.
|
100,139
|
16.5
|
16.5
|
|
18
|
West
flowing rivers of Kutch & Sourastra including Luni
|
321,851
|
15.1
|
15
|
|
19
|
Area
of inland drainagein Rajasthan
|
-
|
Neg
|
-
|
|
20
|
Minor
rivers draining into Myanmar (Burma) and Bangladesh
|
36,202
|
31
|
-
|
|
|
Total
|
|
1869.4
|
690
|
|
Distribution
of water resources in the country
|
||
|
1
|
Indus
|
7%
|
|
2
|
Ganga,
Brahmaputra, Barak and others
|
40%
|
|
3
|
Godavari
|
11%
|
|
4
|
Krishna
|
8%
|
|
5
|
Mahanadi
|
7%
|
|
6
|
Narmada
|
5%
|
|
7
|
Others
|
22%
|
|
Estimation
of water resources of India
|
||
|
Sl.No
|
Agency
|
Estimate
in BCM
|
|
1
|
First Irrigation Commission (1902-03)
|
1443
|
|
2
|
Dr. A.N. Khosla (1949)
|
1673
|
|
3
|
Central Water and Power Commission (1954 –
60)
|
1881
|
|
4
|
National Commission on Agriculture
|
1850
|
|
5
|
Central Water Commission (1988)
|
1880
|
|
6
|
Central Water Commission (1993)
|
1869
|
The CWC in the year 1993 is considered 1869
as reliable. The CWC estimated the utilizable surface water in each river basin
considering the suitable sites / location for diversion and storage structures
to meet the needs of irrigation and demand of domestic, industrial and other
sectors as 690 BCM. The unconsolidated sediments from potential ground water
aquifers giving copious supplies of ground water while the compact or
crystalline formations from poor aquifers and yield low discharge. The annual
replenish able ground water resource for the entire country is 433 BCM as on
March 2004.
|
The
state wise Replenishable Ground Water Resource in India
|
||||||||
|
Sl. No
|
Name of
the state
|
Annual
Replenishable Ground Water Resource
|
Total
|
|||||
|
|
|
Monsoon
season
|
Non-monsoon
season
|
|||||
|
Recharge
from rainfall
|
Recharge
from other source
|
Recharge
from rainfall
|
Recharge
from other source
|
|||||
|
1
|
Andhra
Pradesh
|
16.04
|
8.93
|
4.20
|
7.33
|
36.50
|
||
|
2
|
Arunachal
Pradesh
|
1.57
|
0.00
|
0.98
|
0.00
|
2.56
|
||
|
3
|
Assam
|
23.65
|
1.99
|
1.05
|
0.54
|
27.23
|
||
|
4
|
Bihar
|
19.45
|
3.96
|
3.42
|
2.36
|
29.19
|
||
|
5
|
Chhattisgarh
|
12.07
|
0.43
|
1.30
|
1.13
|
14.93
|
||
|
6
|
Delhi
|
0.13
|
0.06
|
0.02
|
0.09
|
0.30
|
||
|
7
|
Gujarat
|
10.59
|
2.08
|
0.00
|
3.15
|
15.81
|
||
|
8
|
Goa
|
0.22
|
0.01
|
0.01
|
0.04
|
0.29
|
||
|
9
|
Haryana
|
3.52
|
2.15
|
0.92
|
2.72
|
9.31
|
||
|
10
|
Himachal
Pradesh
|
0.33
|
0.01
|
0.08
|
0.02
|
0.43
|
||
|
11
|
Jammu
& Kashmir
|
0.61
|
0.77
|
1.00
|
0.32
|
2.70
|
||
|
12
|
Jharkhand
|
4.26
|
0.14
|
1.00
|
0.18
|
5.58
|
||
|
13
|
Karnataka
|
8.17
|
4.01
|
1.50
|
2.25
|
15.93
|
||
|
14
|
Kerala
|
3.79
|
0.01
|
1.93
|
1.11
|
6.84
|
||
|
15
|
Madhya
Pradesh
|
30.59
|
0.96
|
0.05
|
5.59
|
37.19
|
||
|
16
|
Maharashtra
|
20.15
|
2.51
|
1.94
|
8.36
|
32.96
|
||
|
17
|
Manipur
|
0.20
|
0.01
|
0.16
|
0.01
|
0.38
|
||
|
18
|
Meghalaya
|
0.79
|
0.03
|
0.33
|
0.01
|
1.15
|
||
|
19
|
Mizoram
|
0.03
|
0.00
|
0.02
|
0.00
|
0.04
|
||
|
20
|
Nagaland
|
0.28
|
0.00
|
0.08
|
0.00
|
0.36
|
||
|
21
|
Orissa
|
12.81
|
3.56
|
3.58
|
3.14
|
23.09
|
||
|
22
|
Punjab
|
5.98
|
10.91
|
1.36
|
5.54
|
23.78
|
||
|
23
|
Rajasthan
|
8.76
|
0.62
|
0.26
|
1.92
|
11.56
|
||
|
24
|
Sikkim
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0.08
|
||
|
25
|
Tamil
Nadu
|
4.91
|
11.96
|
4.53
|
1.67
|
23.07
|
||
|
26
|
Tripura
|
1.10
|
0.00
|
0.92
|
0.17
|
2.19
|
||
|
27
|
Uttar
Pradesh
|
38.63
|
11.95
|
5.64
|
20.14
|
76.35
|
||
|
28
|
Uttaranchal
|
1.37
|
0.27
|
0.12
|
0.51
|
2.27
|
||
|
29
|
West
Bengal
|
17.87
|
2.19
|
5.44
|
4.86
|
30.36
|
||
|
|
Total
States
|
247.87
|
69.51
|
41.84
|
73.15
|
432.43
|
||
|
1
|
Andaman
Nicobar
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0.33
|
||
|
2
|
Chandigarh
|
0.02
|
0.00
|
0.01
|
0.00
|
0.02
|
||
|
3
|
Daman
& Diu
|
0.01
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.01
|
||
|
4
|
Dadar
& Hagar Haveli
|
0.06
|
0.01
|
-
|
-
|
0.06
|
||
|
5
|
Lakshadweep
|
Water
resources computed using climate water balance STU
|
0.01
|
|||||
|
6
|
Pondicherry
|
0.06
|
0.07
|
0.01
|
0.03
|
0.16
|
||
|
|
Total
Uts
|
0.14
|
0.08
|
0.01
|
0.03
|
0.60
|
||
|
|
Grand
Total
|
248.01
|
69.59
|
41.85
|
73.18
|
433.03
|
||
|
Basin-wise
Replenishable Ground water Resources
|
||
|
Sl. No
|
Basin
|
Resources
2004 (BCM)
|
|
1
|
Indus
|
31.23
|
|
2
|
Ganga – Brhmaputra - Meghna
|
209.85
|
|
3
|
Godavari
|
37.50
|
|
4
|
Krishna
|
26.65
|
|
5
|
Cauvery
|
10.15
|
|
6
|
Pennar
|
5.10
|
|
7
|
East Flowing Rivers between Mahanadi and
Pennar
|
14.17
|
|
8
|
East Flowing Rivers between Pennar and
Kanyakumari
|
18.11
|
|
9
|
Mahanadi
|
17.72
|
|
10
|
Brahmain - Baitarni
|
6.70
|
|
11
|
Subarnarekha
|
5.13
|
|
12
|
Sabarmati
|
2.98
|
|
13
|
Mahi
|
3.12
|
|
14
|
West Flowing Rivers of Kutch and Saurashtra
|
11.90
|
|
15
|
Narmada
|
12.90
|
|
16
|
Tapi
|
7.36
|
|
17
|
West Flowing Rivers Tapi and Tadri
|
12.38
|
|
18
|
West Flowing Rivers Tadri to Kanyakumari
|
|
|
19
|
Rivers into Bangladesh and Myanmar
|
0.40
|
|
|
Total
|
432.64
|
|
20
|
Andaman, Nicobar & Lakshadweep
|
0.34
|
|
|
Grand
Total
|
432.98
|
Preliminary studies indicate that in alluvium
ground water can be extracted down to 450m as in Indo-Gangetic valley. The
coastal aquifers are also having similar depth range of ground water
availability. Inland river basins in the country have shallower depth within
the range of 100-150 m. In hard rock terrain, ground water is generally available
till about 100m depth. The total
estimated static ground water resource is 10,812 BCM.
|
Per
capita availability
|
||
|
Year
|
Population
(in Millions)
|
Per
capita availability (in cubic meters)
|
|
2001
|
1027 (2001 census)
|
1820
|
|
2025
|
1394 (Projected)
|
1340
|
|
2050
|
1640 (Projected)
|
1140
|
The need
for Inter – Basin Water Transfer to Augment Available Water Resources:
The summer monsoon accounts for more
than 85% of the precipitation. The uncertainty of occurrence of rainfall marked
by prolonged dry spells and fluctuations in seasonal and annual rainfall Is a
serious problem for the country. Floods are recurring features, particularly in
Brahmaputra and Ganga rivers accounting for almost 60% of the river flow of our
country. On the other hand, large areas in the states of Rajasthan, Gujarat,
Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu face recurring droughts. As much as 85% of drought prone area falls in
these states. The water availability even for drinking purpose becomes
critical, particularly in summer months as the rivers dry up and the ground
water recedes. Regional variations in rainfall lead to situations when some
parts of the country do not have enough water even for raising a single crop.
One of the most attractive options
available to augment Available Water Resource (AWR) in deficit basins, while
reducing the flood peaks to some extent is Inter Basin Water Transfer
(IBWT)from surplus to deficit area of river basins. Starting with National
Perspective Plan (NPP) of 1980, National Water Development Agency (NWDA) has at
length studied Indian River Basin sunder two separate components. Himalayan and
Peninsula and identified over 30 links which can transfer about 200BCM of fresh
water within sub basins of large basins by the side of smaller links for smaller
basins. After feasibility studies, DPR preparation is in progress for at least
two links. Studies done so far also indicate that the Brahmaputra, Ganga,
Mahanadi, Godavari and west flowing rivers originating from the western Ghats
have surplus waters for transfer. While carrying out IBWT, the country could
avail augmentation for additional irrigation. Domestic and industrial water
supply, hydro power generation, navigation facilities etc.
Need for integrated approach to water
resources development and management. A large quantum of municipal and
industrial effluent is discharged untreated it to the rivers. Return flow from
irrigated areas also pollute river water with residual fertilizers, pesticides
and herbicides. Ground water is also getting polluted in similar fashion.
Extraction of ground water has started playing a a major role in water resource
development.
Conflicts on sharing of water will
also reduce if concept of IWRM is put in practice. IWRDM makes it necessary to
create Basin Authority for managing Inter State Water Basins. River Basin
Organisations (RBO) constituted with multidisciplinary units only can achieve
the desired coordination. Comprehensive plans for optimal development of
surface and ground water systems and promotion of measures for prevention of
water logging and conservation of water quality.
Holistic approach to Integrated River Basin
Planning and Management (IRBPM) to achieve optimal benefit and interstate
allocation based on the economic value of water will not be possible if planning
is to be governed by interstate allocations.
Water has come to be accepted,
historically, as a state subject. The political perceptions may not help in
enacting legislation under Entry 56, List I
(Union List). With different political parties in power at the centre
and in the states, regional parties in the state demanding more autonomy and
article 262 having been used sparingly. Significant changes and major
amendments in the constitutional provisions will be very difficult. Still RBOs
can be established through minor amendments to the constitution. Efforts are
being made by Ministry of Water resources / Central Water Commission to create
River Basin Organisations for the river Mahanadi and Godavari.
National Water Policy: National Water
policy (2002) embodies the Nation’s resolve that planning, development and
management of water resources would be governed by National perspective. The
updated National Water Policy lays emphasis on Integrated Water resource
development and management for optimal and sustainable utilisation of the
available surface and ground water. NWP
has prioritised the water allocations are under Drinking, Irrigation,
Hydropower, Navigation and Industrial and other uses in that order.
Drought:
Drought prone areas: The central water
commission during 1975-82 studied and identified on a regional level 99 drought
prone districts in 13 states covering area about 108 M. ha.In case of long
duration hydrological droughts, local rainwater harvesting is not successful.It
is now being generally accepted that an integrated basin wise planning of
development of water resources through major and medium projects and rainwater
harvesting and watershed development at micro level is necessary. In addition
percolation tanks have shown commendable success wherever practiced in reducing
the severity of drought.
Artificial recharge of ground water,
creation of surface storages, Inter basin transfer of water, Water conservation
measures, cropping pattern, Providing irrigation during critical growth, sprinkler
and drip irrigation, conjunctive use of surface and ground water, reduction in
conveyance losses, Reduction in evaporation from soil surface, renovation of
tanks, ground water use, Reduction of evaporation . Loss from (Reservoirs:
Shallow tanks with large surface area in drought region lose nearly half of the
water storage by evaporation. The loss is reduced by spreading a chemical like
Cetyle-Steryle and fatty alcohol emulsion) desalinization.
Flood:
Landslides in Himalayas, spilling of rivers
over their banks, drainage congestion, some of the rivers to change their
course, erosion along the banks.Huge amount of silt brought by Himalayan rivers
get deposited diring the receding floods forcing the rivers to change their
course. This result in erosion of banks, the fertile land as well as the
embankments. Urban drainage.
Flood
prone areas:
Structural measures- embankments and
flood walls, dams and reservoirs, Natural detention basin, drainage improvement
diversion of flood water. Non- structural measures: Floodplain management,
flood proofing, Flood forecasting and warning: Modernisation of flood
forecasting service, flood fighting , flood disaster relief; Climate
forecasting system, Components of disaster management project, Disaster
preparedness and response planning
Cyclones:
Cyclone disaster management, National
cyclone risk mitigation project. The west coast revers (as many as 600) are of
great importance. Although only 3% of the areal extent of the basins of India
is drained by these rivers, as much as 14% of the countries water resources are
contained in them.
The main water resource of India consists of
precipitation on Indian Territory which is estimated to be around 4000 BCM per
year. In addition it receives transbounary flows in the rivers and aquifers
from upper riparian countries.
|
State
wise distribution of Large dams in India
|
|||
|
Sl. No
|
State /
Organisation
|
Already
completed
|
Under construction
|
|
1
|
Andhra Pradesh
|
281
|
51
|
|
2
|
Bihar
|
24
|
4
|
|
3
|
Chhattisgarh
|
243
|
16
|
|
4
|
Gujarat
|
598
|
68
|
|
5
|
Jharkhand
|
49
|
28
|
|
6
|
Karnataka
|
229
|
7
|
|
7
|
Kerala
|
53
|
1
|
|
8
|
Madhya Pradesh
|
899
|
7
|
|
9
|
Maharashtra
|
1676
|
145
|
|
10
|
Orissa
|
157
|
0
|
|
11
|
Rajasthan
|
180
|
23
|
|
12
|
Tamil Nadu
|
107
|
1
|
|
13
|
Uttar Pradesh
|
115
|
16
|
|
14
|
West Bengal
|
28
|
0
|
|
15
|
Other states
|
70
|
23
|
|
|
Total
|
4711
|
390
|
|
|
Grand
Total
|
5101
|
|
|
Basin
wise storage of large dams in India
|
||||
|
Sl.No
|
Name of
the basin
|
Live
storage capacities up to July 2007.
|
||
|
Completed
projects
|
Projects
Under construction
|
Total
|
||
|
1
|
Indus
|
16285.90
|
282.53
|
16568.43
|
|
2
|
a).
Ganga
|
42060.20
|
18600.18
|
60660.38
|
|
|
b).
Brahmaputra and Barak
|
2326.92
|
9353.64
|
11680.56
|
|
3
|
Godavari
|
25124.60
|
6205.79
|
31330.39
|
|
4
|
Krishna
|
41803.98
|
7743.54
|
49547.52
|
|
5
|
Cauvery
|
8597.20
|
269.82
|
8867.02
|
|
6
|
Pennar
|
2649.40
|
2170.71
|
4820.11
|
|
7
|
Brahmani
& Baitarni
|
4648.09
|
875.60
|
5523.69
|
|
8
|
Mahanadi
|
12334.80
|
1873.00
|
14207.80
|
|
9
|
Subarnarekha
|
672.02
|
1650.19
|
2322.21
|
|
10
|
Mahi
|
4722.60
|
261.43
|
4984.03
|
|
11
|
Sabarmati
|
1306.77
|
60.77
|
1367.54
|
|
12
|
Narmada
|
16979.50
|
6625.10
|
23604.60
|
|
13
|
Tapi
|
9408.37
|
847.42
|
10255.79
|
|
14
|
West
flowing rivers from Tapi to Tadri
|
11268.03
|
3464.38
|
14732.41
|
|
15
|
West
flowing rivers from Tadri to Kanyakumari
|
10236.16
|
1317.54
|
11553.70
|
|
16
|
East
flowing rivers between Mahanadi to Godavari and Krishna to Pennar.
|
1601.44
|
1424.97
|
3026.41
|
|
17
|
East
flowing rivers between Pennar and Kanyakumari.
|
1838.41
|
68.49
|
1906.90
|
|
18
|
West
flowing rivers of Kutch & Saurashtra including Luni
|
4726.92
|
797.23
|
5524.15
|
|
19
|
Medium
Projects each having a capacity of less than 10MCM
|
6241.00
|
|
6241.00
|
|
20
|
Minor
rivers draining into Myanmar (Burma) and Bangladesh
|
312.00
|
|
312.00
|
|
|
Total in MCM
|
225144.31
|
63892.33
|
289036.64
|
|
|
Grand Total in BCM
|
225.14
|
63.89
|
289.03
|
Dam safety:
Any development measure such as a dam,
building or a bridge, present a degree of risk to life or damage to property
should it fail. The population located along the river bank downstream, often
constitute a higher hazard in the case of a failure than other public
structures.
The sedimentation rate varies from
reservoir to reservoir and the medium value of sedimentation varies from 4.5
ton 21.10 ham /100sq.km/year where as the average sedimentation rate varies
from 6.5 to 35.33 ham/100 sq.km/year. But the rate of sedimentation decrease d
with time.
Soil conservation methods seek to protect the
water shed through such measures as afforestation, pasture development,
protection of river fringes, road sides and the shore lines of reservoirs and
the control of forest fires which ravage tree and grass growth. Various types
of engineering works involved are head water control structures, sediment and
debris detention dams, check dams farm ponds etc. Execution of soil
conservation works provides increasing permanent vegetative cover in the
critically eroded areas, detention of silt to ensure better permeability and
absorption of water in the soil profile and reduce siltation rate and increase
the life of the reservoirs.
|
The
water requirement for various sectors. As per the assumption of the Standing
sub-committee.
|
||||||
|
Sl.No
|
Sector
|
Water
demand
|
||||
|
1990
|
2000
|
2010
|
2025
|
2050
|
||
|
1
|
Irrigation
|
437
|
541
|
688
|
910
|
1072
|
|
2
|
Drinking incl. live stock
|
32
|
42
|
56
|
73
|
102
|
|
3
|
Industrial
|
-
|
8
|
12
|
23
|
63
|
|
4
|
Energy
|
-
|
2
|
5
|
15
|
130
|
|
5
|
Others
|
33
|
41
|
52
|
72
|
80
|
|
|
Total
|
502
|
634
|
813
|
1093
|
1447
|
Future water
requirements:
As
per the National Commission for Integrated Water Resources Development (NCIWRD)
Water requirements for different uses. (in
BCM)
|
Sl. No
|
Uses
|
2010
|
2025
|
2050
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Low
|
High
|
%
|
Low
|
High
|
%
|
Low
|
High
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||
|
1
|
Irrigation
|
330
|
330
|
48
|
325
|
366
|
43
|
375
|
463
|
39
|
|||||||||||||
|
2
|
Domestic
|
23
|
24
|
3
|
30
|
36
|
5
|
48
|
65
|
6
|
|||||||||||||
|
3
|
Industries
|
26
|
26
|
4
|
47
|
47
|
6
|
57
|
57
|
5
|
|||||||||||||
|
4
|
Power
|
14
|
15
|
2
|
25
|
26
|
3
|
50
|
56
|
5
|
|||||||||||||
|
5
|
Inland
Navigation
|
7
|
7
|
1
|
10
|
10
|
1
|
15
|
15
|
1
|
|||||||||||||
|
6
|
Flood
control
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
|||||||||||||
|
7
|
Environment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
i)
|
Afforestation
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
-
|
0
|
|||||||||||||
|
ii)
|
Ecology
|
5
|
5
|
1
|
10
|
10
|
1
|
20
|
20
|
2
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Evaporation
loses
|
42
|
42
|
6
|
50
|
50
|
6
|
76
|
76
|
6
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Total
|
447
|
458
|
65
|
497
|
545
|
65
|
641
|
752
|
64
|
|||||||||||||
|
Ground Water
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
|
Irrigation
|
213
|
218
|
31
|
236
|
245
|
29
|
253
|
344
|
29
|
|||||||||||||
|
2
|
Domestic
& Municipal
|
19
|
19
|
2
|
25
|
26
|
3
|
42
|
46
|
4
|
|||||||||||||
|
3
|
Industries
|
11
|
11
|
1
|
20
|
20
|
2
|
24
|
24
|
2
|
|||||||||||||
|
4
|
Power
|
4
|
4
|
1
|
6
|
7
|
1
|
13
|
14
|
1
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Total
|
247
|
252
|
35
|
287
|
298
|
35
|
32
|
428
|
36
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Grand
Total
|
694
|
710
|
100
|
784
|
843
|
100
|
973
|
1180
|
100
|
|||||||||||||
|
Total Water Use
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1
|
Irrigation
|
543
|
557
|
78
|
561
|
611
|
72
|
628
|
807
|
68
|
|||||||||||||
|
2
|
Domestic
|
42
|
43
|
6
|
55
|
62
|
7
|
90
|
111
|
9
|
|||||||||||||
|
3
|
Industries
|
37
|
37
|
5
|
67
|
67
|
8
|
81
|
81
|
7
|
|||||||||||||
|
4
|
Power
|
18
|
19
|
3
|
31
|
33
|
4
|
63
|
70
|
6
|
|||||||||||||
|
5
|
Inland
Navigation
|
7
|
7
|
1
|
10
|
10
|
1
|
15
|
15
|
1
|
|||||||||||||
|
6
|
Flood
control
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|||||||||||||
|
7
|
Environment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
i)
|
Afforestation
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|||||||||||||
|
ii)
|
Ecology
|
5
|
5
|
1
|
10
|
10
|
1
|
20
|
20
|
1
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Evaporation
loses
|
42
|
42
|
6
|
50
|
50
|
6
|
76
|
76
|
7
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Total
|
694
|
710
|
100
|
784
|
843
|
100
|
973
|
1180
|
100
|
|||||||||||||
|
Sl.No
|
Sector
|
Water
demand in BCM
|
|||||
|
Standing
Sub-committee of MOWR
|
NCIWRD
|
||||||
|
|
|
2010
|
2025
|
2050
|
2010
|
2025
|
2050
|
|
1
|
Irrigation
|
688
|
910
|
1072
|
557
|
611
|
807
|
|
2
|
Domestic
|
56
|
73
|
102
|
43
|
62
|
111
|
|
3
|
Industries
|
12
|
23
|
63
|
37
|
67
|
81
|
|
4
|
Power/
Energy
|
5
|
15
|
130
|
19
|
33
|
70
|
|
5
|
Others
|
52
|
72
|
80
|
54
|
70
|
111
|
|
|
Total
|
813
|
1093
|
1447
|
710
|
843
|
|
NCIWRD follow the estimates of higher and
lower limits of Indian population in the year 2050 as 1581 million (high) and
1346 million (low). It felt that India’s population of 1027 million (2001
census) would stabilize at 1600million by 2050. This would require about 450
million tonnes of food grains annually and 500 million tonnes of food grains by
2050 would be planned. To reach this, the ultimate irrigation potential is
assessed as 140 M ha through all the irrigation schemes. In order to achieve
the food grain production of 550 million tonnes, 3.25 tonnes /ha for irrigated
and 1.5 tonnes/ha for the un-irrigated area sand concluded that it would be
necessary to harness the entire irrigation potential of 165 M ha to match the projected food requirements
for the year 2050 and 140 M ha for 2025. It is also proposed to increase the
irrigation efficiency from the present 30 – 40% to 60%. NCIWRD aimed at to
provide 220 litres per capita per day (lpcd) for urban and 150 lpcd for the
rural areas for domestic use; 63 BCM for industrial and 130 BCM for Power use
by 2050. The situation can only be managed by different methods of conservation
of water and adopting all measures for exploiting/tapping the remaining water
resources in the identified proposals to be given priority so that additional
water is available to meet the demand for all sectors by 2050.

No comments:
Post a Comment